ReviewJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2026
Alternative Developmental Toxicity Screening Methods Using Chick Embryo-Based Models.
Review in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonclinical developmental toxicity studies are used to investigate the potential toxicities of drugs and chemical candidates on normal embryonic and fetal development during pregnancy, generally using mammalian laboratory animals such as rats and rabbits. Despite being well-established, these models have ethical concerns, high costs, and long study durations. Consequently, alternative models, including in vitro human cell cultures, stem cell differentiation, 3D organoids, and zebrafish, are actively being studied; however, they have limitations in replicating whole-body physiological complexity and homeostasis. Therefore, this study reviewed the use of chick embryo-based models in developmental toxicity screening to overcome the limitations of other alternative models. Notably, chick embryos have been already utilized in cardiovascular development, cancer, and vaccine development. This study provides an overview of the advantages of chick embryo-based models, including developmental relevance, cost-effectiveness, and ethical alleviation, along with their limitations and future directions. Our review suggests that chick embryo-based models can complement current mammalian laboratory animal-based models and bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo systems. However, continued research toward standardization of protocols, validation of methods, and technological integration is required to position chick embryo-based models as a more practical and efficient model for nonclinical developmental toxicity studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.