ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Sustained effectiveness and safety of esketamine for major depressive disorder: a target trial simulation of real-world data.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of esketamine in adults with Major depressive disorder (MDD), focusing on suicide-related events, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This target-trial simulation used the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Adults (≥ 18 years) with MDD who received either esketamine or a conventional antidepressant during an inpatient episode were included. After propensity-score matching for demographic and clinical variables, matched pairs were analyzed followed up to 2 years. The primary outcome was a composite of suicide-related events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated across acute (days 1-14), intermediate (days 15-365), and long-term (days 15-730) periods. After 1:1 matching, 3383 pairs were analyzed. Esketamine use was associated with lower suicide-related events at days 1-14 (0.77% vs 3.78%; HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.29; P < 0.001), days 15-365 (2.13% vs 2.63%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = 0.003), and days 15-730 (2.66% vs 2.78%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99; P = 0.04). Mortality was lower (6.03% vs 7.63%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.73; P < 0.001), as was recurrent MDD at 2 years (3.46% vs 4.67%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = 0.04). MACEs were lower during days 1-14 (2.10% vs 4.97%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; P < 0.001) and not significantly different thereafter. In conclusion, esketamine treatment was associated with sustained reductions in suicidal ideation and all-cause mortality without increased MACEs risk. The composite suicide-related outcome was primarily driven by reductions in suicidal ideation; differences in suicide attempt and intentional self-harm could not be determined due to low event counts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.