Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963395›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prospecting and characterization of potential probiotic lactobacilli from animal gut and food sources.

Chioma Vivian Asiegbu, Frederick Tawi Tabit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chioma Vivian AsiegbuDepartment of Life and Consumer Sciences, University of South Africa, Cnr Christiaan de Wet Road and Pioneer Avenue, Florida, Roodepoort, 1710, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-3204
Frederick Tawi TabitDepartment of Life and Consumer Sciences, University of South Africa, Cnr Christiaan de Wet Road and Pioneer Avenue, Florida, Roodepoort, 1710, South Africa. tabitft@unisa.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-8415

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa Grant number: 129095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Lactobacillus species from African environments remain insufficiently characterised, despite their potential to serve as locally adapted, cost-effective probiotic candidates. This study explored plant- and poultry-derived lactobacilli to identify strains with functional traits relevant to gastrointestinal survival, host interaction, and food-related applications. Eighteen isolates recovered from chicken gut, tomatoes, cucumbers, and bananas were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and assessed in vitro for acid and bile tolerance, bile-salt hydrolase (BSH) activity, exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, cholesterol assimilation, antioxidant capacity, antimicrobial effects, auto-aggregation, hydrophobicity, adhesion to Caco-2 cells, and safety indicators, including haemolysis, DNase activity, and antibiotic susceptibility. The isolates exhibited pronounced strain-specific variation, with several functional traits occurring in coordinated patterns. Strong acid and bile tolerance frequently aligned with BSH activity, while EPS production correlated with enhanced auto-aggregation. Two tomato-derived Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains (To3a and To3d) consistently demonstrated the most favourable combination of survival, functional, and safety attributes, including high acid/bile tolerance, notable antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and strong adhesion to Caco-2 cells. All isolates were non-haemolytic and DNase-negative, and most remained susceptible to clinically relevant antibiotics. Locally sourced L. plantarum strains showed multiple complementary probiotic traits, underscoring their potential as regionally adapted candidates for food or microbial intervention applications. However, genomic characterisation and in vivo validation are required to confirm safety, exclude transferable resistance determinants, and substantiate probiotic efficacy.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyGastrointestinal TractLactobacillusProbioticsAmidohydrolasesAnimalsAntioxidantsBacterial AdhesionBile Acids and SaltsCaco-2 CellsChickensHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmidohydrolasesAntioxidantsBile Acids and Saltscholoylglycine hydrolaseRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID41963395
PMCPMC13201595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.