Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963402›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid large language model framework for structured data entry from code-switched persian clinical speech.

Mohammad Tanhaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammad TanhaeiDepartment of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. mohamad.tanhaei@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Converting spoken clinical dictation into structured electronic health record (EHR) entries poses significant challenges in low-resource languages. These difficulties are primarily driven by phonetic complexity and the prevalent phenomenon of code-switching with English medical terminology, both of which severely degrade the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models. This paper presents a practical hybrid framework that combines ASR, Persian-specific normalization of code-switched and orthographically ambiguous terms, metadata-constrained field mapping, and uncertainty-triggered human review for structured EHR entry. Leveraging large language model (LLM) prompting and specialized bilingual glossaries, this module normalizes code-switched terms and disambiguates Persian-specific homophones. The proposed method employs embedding-based field mapping guided by form metadata and existing clinical annotations, supplemented by selective human-in-the-loop validation for high-stakes fields. Evaluation within the BioArc EHR system demonstrates substantial improvements in transcription quality and structured data accuracy. Experimental results and granular ablation studies confirm that explicitly addressing linguistic challenges such as code-switching and homophone variability is critical for improving field detection rates and supporting data integrity. Our findings underscore that while the framework serves as a robust assistive tool–achieving high field detection accuracy in controlled evaluations–a hybrid workflow remains essential to address residual error rates (approximately 5–10% in complex forms) and support the precision required for medical documentation.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsSpeech Recognition SoftwareHumansLanguageLarge Language ModelsAutomated Data EntryCode-SwitchingData ExtractionElectronic Health RecordsLLMLow-Resource LanguagesPersian Clinical SpeechVoice-to-Form

Identifiers

PMID41963402
PMCPMC13230711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.