ArticleScientific reports2026
Synergistic Potential of Repurposing non-β-lactam Compounds as Class A serine β-lactamases Inhibitor: Insights from MolecularDocking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Antimicrobial Potentiation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) represents an urgent public health challenge. This study employed a drug repurposing strategy integrating in-silico screening, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and in-vitro validation to identify FDA-approved compounds capable of potentiating β-lactam antibiotics against ESBL-producing bacteria. Structure-based virtual screening of 400 FDA-approved compounds against SHV-1 β-lactamase (PDB: 4ZAM) identified 28 compounds with promising binding energies. Four commercially available compounds; epinephrine, omeprazole, sulfadimethoxine, and captopril exhibited binding energies ranging from − 8.15 to − 9.58 kcal/mol with RMSD values of 1.5–2.3 Å, comparable to the reference inhibitor avibactam. MD simulations (250 ns) confirmed the stability of all protein–ligand complexes, with the SHV-1/epinephrine complex demonstrating the lowest RMSD (0.155 nm) and most compact structure. In-vitro evaluation against an ESBL-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolate revealed that epinephrine and omeprazole effectively enhanced antibiotic activity in disk diffusion assays. The ceftriaxone/omeprazole combination achieved the highest potentiation (20 mm at 250 µg/mL), followed by ceftriaxone/epinephrine (18 mm at 250 µg/mL) and cefuroxime/omeprazole (19 mm at 125 µg/mL). Notably, captopril showed no in-vitro activity despite favorable computational predictions, underscoring the importance of experimental validation in drug discovery. These findings highlight the potential of epinephrine and omeprazole as readily available adjuvants against Class A serine β-lactamases, offering a cost-effective strategy to combat ESBL-mediated antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.