ArticleScientific reports2026
Reusable macroporous polyethyleneimine sponges for sustainable removal of dual-arsenic species: mechanistic and life cycle assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater arsenic contamination poses serious health risks, demanding sustainable and cost-effective remediation. This study reports the synthesis of macroporous polyethyleneimine (PEI) sponges prepared via ice-templating and glutaraldehyde crosslinking, designed for reusability and high adsorption performance in arsenic removal. The amine-rich PEI matrix provides abundant binding sites, while its interconnected macroporous structure enhances ion accessibility and mass transfer. The sponges achieved > 90% arsenic removal, decreasing concentrations from 83.75 µg/L to < 10 µg/L, meeting WHO/BIS standards. FTIR and FESEM-EDX analyses confirm electrostatic and chelation-based interactions between amine groups and arsenic species. Experimental adsorption capacities (qₑₓₚ) at 120 µg/L initial concentration were 187.0 ± 4.2 µg/g for As(V) and 182.5 ± 5.1 µg/g for As(III) at pH 6.7. The Langmuir model predicted theoretical maxima of 1251.7 µg/g (As(V)) and 1053.9 µg/g (As(III)). Techno-economic and life cycle assessments demonstrated a low treatment cost ($0.183/L), 70% reduced operational expenditure, and 40% lower carbon emissions compared to reverse osmosis and activated alumina. Field application in Murshidabad, India, verified real-world efficiency under co-contaminated groundwater conditions. The combination of scalable fabrication, reusability, and eco-efficiency positions PEI sponges as a sustainable alternative for decentralized arsenic remediation aligned with SDG 6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.