ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparison of biochemical oxidative stress markers of glucose tolerance tests performed for.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigated whether any differences in the oxidative stress (OS) occurred between the two different methods used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening. In this cross-sectional case-control study, 41 women and 47 women in the 24th-28th weeks of pregnancy underwent a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) (Group 1) and 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (Group 2), respectively. The levels of sirtuin (SIRT), total thiol, native thiol, disulfide, native SS, SS total SH, IMA, albumin, and adjusted-Ischemia Modified Albumin (IMA) were tested. The OS marker values of the hour-0 and hour-1 were compared in these two groups. The levels of native thiol in hour 1, total thiol in hour 1, disulfide in hour 0 and 1, disulfide/native thiol in hour 0 and 1, disulfide/total thiol in hour 0 and 1, and adj.-IMA in hour 1 were statistically significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1. The IMA value in hour 1 was higher in group 2 compared to group 1. The SIRT value in hour-1 was statistically significantly higher compared to the baseline in pregnant women undergoing the 50-g GCT. In pregnant women undergoing the 75-g OGTT; The SIRT value, the disulfide/total thiol ratio, and the IMA values in hour-1 were statistically significantly higher compared to the baseline and the native thiol values, the total thiol levels, and the albumin levels in hour 1 were statistically significantly lower compared to the baseline. The 75-g OGTT, but not the 50-g GCT, induced a significant acute pro-oxidant shift, altering thiol/disulfide homeostasis and increasing IMA levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.