ArticleScientific reports2026
Ependymoma group-specific blood-brain barrier differences uncovered by a multi-omics approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant obstacle in treating brain tumors is the limited drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), characterized by an interplay of endothelial tight junctions and efflux pumps. Brain tumors can alter BBB characteristics; however, there is limited understanding in ependymoma (EPN), the third most common pediatric brain tumor. To this end, we characterized EPN tumor (n = 364) and healthy brain tissues (n = 225) at RNA level and identified a distinct EPN group-specific BBB transcriptional pattern. Analyses of public datasets from Aubin and Gojo as well as a validation single-cell dataset (n = 8) could further specify a novel BBB signature expressed in an endothelial subpopulation. Clinically relevant drugs (n = 3) that were effective against EPN in vitro were further evaluated for BBB penetration in our subtype-specific patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Idasanutlin showed overall low brain-to-plasma ratios, while the P-glycoprotein (PGP) substrates temsirolimus and etoposide accumulated slightly more in zinc finger translocation associated (ZFTA)-fusion positive EPN than in PFA tumors and adjacent brain. These differences align with modestly lower PGP levels in ZFTA PDX, although expression does not necessarily reflect transporter activity and was not consistently observed in patient tumors. Despite these differences, all tested drugs remained below their effective in vitro levels. In summary, multi-omics analyses of BBB characteristics improve the understanding of drug penetrance and may potentially guide treatment choices in the context of molecular EPN groups within upcoming clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.