Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963602›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Bisphenol S and female reproductive toxicity: a scoping review of human studies.

Faye V Andrews, Erin Delker, Jillian Paul, Francisco Moran, Martha S Sandy

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Faye V Andrews *California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, CA, USA. faye.andrews@oehha.ca.gov.
Erin Delker *California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, CA, USA. erin.delker@oehha.ca.gov.
Jillian PaulCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, CA, USA.
Francisco MoranCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Martha S SandyCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphenol S (BPS) is a chemical analogue of Bisphenol A (BPA) used in the production of hard plastics, textiles, and thermal papers. As the use of BPA has declined, BPS human exposure has increased and is now widespread. BPS has endocrine-disrupting properties and growing evidence indicates BPS negatively impacts female reproductive health.

objectiveWe conducted a scoping review of primary research articles related to BPS exposure and female reproductive toxicity in humans.

methodsWe searched five biomedical databases through January 2025 for studies that assessed the effects of BPS exposure on outcomes related to female reproduction in humans. Included studies used a cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional study design, measured BPS in individuals, presented original data analyses, and adjusted for confounding variables. We tabulated study characteristics and key findings of the included studies.

resultsThe literature search and screening yielded thirty-four studies for inclusion. Across studies, the LOD for BPS varied widely, from 0.002 to 0.20 ng/mL, and so did the proportion of samples with detectable BPS, from 14.8% to 100%. BPS was associated with greater risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome in two studies and gestational diabetes mellitus or related biomarkers in three studies. BPS was also associated with changes in thyroid hormones, reproductive hormones, and pubertal timing, though the directions of effects for these outcomes were mixed. BPS was not associated with endometriosis, gestational hypertension, or infertility. SIGNIFICANCE: There is evidence from human studies that BPS exposure can cause some adverse female reproduction outcomes, though data were limited in number of studies per outcome, variable limits of BPS detection, and differences in exposure to BPS across samples. Despite limitations, epidemiologic data, considered along with in vitro and animal data, is important in identifying BPS as a hazard to female reproduction. IMPACT: Human exposure to BPS is increasing. The findings of this review of 34 epidemiologic studies suggests a link between BPS exposure and some adverse female reproductive health outcomes. This review also highlights data gaps in variable limits of BPS detection, differences in exposure, and the limited number of studies for specific outcomes. In addition to epidemiological evidence, in vitro and animal data show sufficient evidence to support BPS as a female reproductive.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposurePhenolsReproductionSulfonesBisphenol S CompoundsFemaleHumansPregnancybisphenol SBisphenol S CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsPhenolsSulfonesendocrine disruptorsepidemiologymaternal and fetal exposure/healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41963602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.