ArticleBMC health services research2026
Factors that influence joy at work and job satisfaction for allied health professionals in public health services: a theory-informed qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA national shortage of allied health professionals, alongside rising demand for services, has heightened concerns about workforce wellbeing and its influence on retention. While factors such as joy in work and job satisfaction are known to affect workforce wellbeing, retention and attrition, they remain underexplored in allied health. This study examined positive and negative influences on joy in work and job satisfaction among allied health professionals in a public hospital.
methodsA theory-informed qualitative study was conducted at a major metropolitan Australian public health service that employs > 1000 allied health professionals across its campuses and services (January–May 2023). Allied health professionals across 10 disciplines and varying levels of seniority were invited to participate in focus groups to explore joy in work and job satisfaction; a purposive sampling approach ensured representation. Focus group questions drew on the Institute of Healthcare Improvement Joy in Work (IHI JiW) Framework and Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Transcripts underwent inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis, with themes compared against the two frameworks.
resultsFive focus groups (n = 25) captured perspectives from junior allied health professionals to managers with < 5 to > 10 years’ experience. Six themes shaped joy in work: (1) patient interactions and outcomes, (2) workload balance, (3) teamwork, (4) recognition, (5) time for clinical and administrative tasks, and (6) the physical environment. These aligned with six of the nine IHI JiW components. Analysis also revealed six factors enhancing job satisfaction and nine contributing to dissatisfaction, partially reflecting Herzberg’s Theory. Findings highlighted the interplay between extrinsic (e.g., workload, environment) and intrinsic (e.g., achievement, recognition) influences.
conclusionJoy in work and job satisfaction among allied health professionals in the public hospital setting are shaped by a complex interaction of positive and negative factors that contribute to worker wellbeing. Organisational strategies to enhance workforce wellbeing should adopt a multifaceted approach, addressing systemic and relational determinants to foster retention and reduce attrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.