ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Molecular biomarkers of cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms after stroke in late-life-enriched cohorts: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are frequent in late-life stroke populations and contribute to long-term disability and care needs. Molecular biomarkers may enable earlier risk stratification and trial enrichment, but the literature remains fragmented across biomarker classes, sampling windows, and phenotype definitions.
methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost were searched from inception to 29 January 2026. Eligible cohorts were defined by an explicit minimum age threshold of ≥ 60 years or a cohort mean/median age ≥ 60 years. To strengthen translational interpretability, the final synthesis additionally used an explicit phenotyping framework for PSCI and NPS, a NOS-informed methodological quality appraisal, a consistency analysis of core biomarker families (NfL, GFAP, and hs-CRP/CRP), a China-versus-non-China subgroup analysis, and a shared/specific biomarker mapping.
resultsThe evidence map comprised 105 studies, predominantly observational, acute-phase, and blood-based. Age eligibility was predominantly indirect: 5/105 studies used an explicit minimum age threshold of ≥ 60 years, whereas 100/105 qualified on cohort mean/median age ≥ 60 years. The literature was geographically concentrated in China (78/105), and methodological quality was uneven, with 86 studies in the higher-quality stratum, 14 in the moderate stratum, and 5 in the lower stratum. NfL (5/5) and GFAP (2/2) showed uniformly positive adjusted associations, mainly in prognostic analyses, whereas CRP-family findings were more heterogeneous (5/7 positive, 1 mixed/attenuated, 1 null). China studies were more often acute, prospective, and PSCI-oriented, whereas non-China studies more often examined inflammation-linked NPS and later-phase phenotypes. Shared biomarker candidates across PSCI and NPS were most evident for NfL and GFAP, while CRP-family markers were shared but more confounding-sensitive.
conclusionsBiomarker research for PSCI and NPS in late-life-enriched stroke cohorts is rapidly expanding but remains heterogeneous in phenotyping, timing, confounder structure, and reporting quality. Harmonized outcome definitions, quality-stratified interpretation, phase-aware serial sampling, and externally validated prediction frameworks with calibration and utility evaluation are priorities for biomarker qualification and clinical implementation. The resulting evidence map is most directly applicable to late-life-enriched rather than strictly age-restricted ≥ 60-year stroke populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.