ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Automatic and explainable assessment for Parkinson's disease by video-based human motion understanding.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe assessment of Parkinson’s disease depends heavily on neurologist experience and involves significant clinical workload, where standard motor examinations require substantial time and face-to-face evaluation, limiting accessibility for patients with mobility constraints. Furthermore, current rating scales contain subjective definitions that lead to rating inconsistencies among clinicians. Existing automated methods exhibit severe problems, including being applicable to only single symptoms, lacking clinical interpretability, and insufficient accuracy.
methodsWe proposed an AI-based, fully automatic, and explainable PD assessment technique using videos. The system detects keypoints on face, body, hands, and feet, then extracts motion features including amplitude, frequency, velocity, and acceleration that directly correspond to MDS-UPDRS rating criteria, enabling explainable assessment. We evaluate all 16 vision-based items in the MDS-UPDRS motor examination, covering symptom categories such as masked face, bradykinesia, postural instability, and tremor symptoms.
resultsOur automated system achieved accuracies of 97.2%, 90.1%, 96.6%, and 96.2% for the four symptom categories respectively in our clinical experiments. When used as clinical support in the real clinical assessment process, the system improved clinician accuracy from 78.7 to 85.3% overall, with correction rates of 15.1%, 8.0%, 36.9%, and 80.1% for each symptom.
conclusionsThis AI-based video assessment provides accurate, automatic, objective, and interpretable Parkinson’s disease evaluation while supporting clinical decision-making. The system enables remote monitoring and reduces healthcare resource strain, particularly benefiting regions with limited neurological expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.