ArticleNursing open2026
Integrating Insights: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Nurses' Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice and Clinical Decision-Making.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo identify the factors influencing nurses' Evidence-based practices (EBP) competencies and clinical decision-making (CDM) levels.
designA convergent parallel mixed-methods study.
methodsThe quantitative data were collected from 387 nurses via the EBP Competence Questionnaire and the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale, while qualitative data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with 20 nurses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression, and qualitative data were subjected to thematic content analysis.
resultsRegression analysis revealed that higher education, research involvement, and following scientific publications positively influenced EBP competencies. Working in inpatient units and clinical nursing roles negatively affected EBP and CDM abilities. A significant positive correlation was found between EBP competence and CDM skills. Qualitative findings identified four themes: Implementation Areas of EBP, Competence in EBP, Impacts of EBP, and Facilitators and Barriers to EBP.
conclusionStrengthening nurses' EBP competencies and CDM requires targeted strategies such as education, access to organizational resources and supportive policies. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Addressing barriers and fostering a culture of continuous learning can enhance patient care and nursing outcomes. IMPACT: By addressing gaps in EBP implementation and decision-making skills, the findings serve as a benchmark for policymakers, educators and healthcare administrators to create supportive infrastructures, promote continuous professional development, and foster a culture of evidence-based practice worldwide. REPORTING
methodThe study was reported in accordance with the GRAMMS guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.