Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964094›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026

Nationwide survey of psychopathology and bullying in tic disorders with and without ADHD.

Yu-Ju Lin, Fang-Ju Tsai, Susan Shur-Fen Gau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu-Ju Lin *Department of Child Development Center and Psychiatry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Fang-Ju Tsai *Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Susan Shur-Fen GauDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. gaushufe@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital FEMH-2025-C-031Ministry of Health and Welfare M03B3374Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 103-2314-B-002-021-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 112-2635-H-418 -001-MY2, MOST 114-2314-B-418 -009-MY3National Health Research Institute, Taiwan NHRI-EX104-10404PI, NHRI-EX105-10404PI, NHRI-EX106-10404PI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and tic disorder (TD) often co-occur. Given the well-established strong link between bullying and adverse psychiatric outcomes, understanding how TD and comorbid ADHD jointly interact to influence bullying involvement is crucial for informing clinical assessment and intervention. This study investigated psychopathology, bullying experiences, and their associations in children with TD, accounting for the influence ADHD, using data from a nationwide epidemiological survey.

methodsThe sample included 4816 children in grades 3, 5, and 7, randomly selected from 69 schools across Taiwan. Categorical psychiatric diagnoses were made through structured child interview using the Kiddie Epidemiologic Version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, while dimensional emotional-behavioral problems were measured using the parent-reported Child Behavior Checklist. Bullying experiences were compared among four groups: TD-alone, ADHD-alone, TD+ADHD, and controls. Mediation analyses explored whether emotional-behavioral problems mediated the relationship between TD and bullying experiences.

resultsAmong participants, 102 (2%) had TD-alone, 388 (8%) had ADHD-alone, and 24 (0.5%) had comorbid TD+ADHD. TD was primarily related to obsessive-compulsive disorder [odds ratio (OR) = 7.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93-20.68]. Children with TD exhibited elevated risks of both school (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.47-4.75) and cyberbullying victimization (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.47-4.74), whereas those with ADHD were more likely to be both perpetrators (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.6-4.36) and victims (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.95-3.47) of school bullying. After adjusting for ADHD, age, and sex, TD exerted a direct association with bullying victimization. Social problems and internalizing problems partially mediate the relationship between TD and school bullying victimization. Notably, thought problems had reduced involvement of cyberbullying among children with TD.

conclusionsTD exerted a direct association with school- and cyber-bullying victimization. Health professionals should routinely assess school-and cyber-bullying victimization, even when ADHD is not present.

Indexed as

ADHDBullyingCyber-bullyingPsychopathologyTic disorders

Identifiers

PMID41964094
PMCPMC13262368

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.