ArticlePain research & management2026
Indications and Adverse Events of Toradol: Based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indications and Adverse Events of Toradol: Based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundToradol, a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is widely used for perioperative analgesia, especially in orthopedic surgeries. Postmarketing surveillance is crucial due to its extensive clinical application. This study aimed to investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with Toradol using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), analyze the association strengths of key AEs, and provide clinical references.
methodFAERS data from 2004 Q1 to 2017 Q4 were analyzed, including reports where Toradol was the primary suspect drug. Disproportionality analyses were conducted using ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM algorithms to detect safety signals.
resultAmong 377 eligible reports, key AEs included immune system disorders (anaphylactic reaction, ROR = 16.28), renal and urinary disorders (oliguria, ROR = 25.57), and gastrointestinal disorders (erosive duodenitis, ROR = 231.08). Notably, 29.86% of reports were from consumers, with a lower proportion from healthcare professionals. Most AEs (73.10%) occurred within 7 days of administration; rare but severe events, including deafness and cardiorespiratory arrest, were also identified.
conclusionOur findings, derived from hypothesis-generating signal detection analyses, provide real-world safety data on Toradol, highlighting high-risk AEs and reporting biases. Enhanced vigilance and monitoring, especially in high-risk populations, are imperative. However, these signals require confirmation through prospective, controlled studies to establish causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.