Trial reportPsychology and psychotherapy2026
Effect of a group-based acceptance and commitment therapy intervention on cognitive emotion regulation and psychological flexibility in patients with bipolar disorder.
Trial report in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the efficacy of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in improving cognitive emotion regulation (CER) and psychological flexibility (PF) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD).
methodsFifty-five Chinese patients with BD type I or II from the inpatient psychiatric unit of a Grade-A tertiary psychiatric hospital in China participated in the intervention. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the ACT+ treatment as usual (TAU) group (10 group sessions) and 27 to TAU alone. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-Fusion (CFQ-F) and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II) were used to assess the participants' CER ability, PF and mania and depressive symptoms at a pre-treatment time-point (baseline) and a post-treatment time-point (5 weeks). ANOVA analysis was conducted to compare the scores before and after treatment in the two groups.
resultsThe ACT + TAU group demonstrated more substantial improvements in CER, PF, as well as residual mania and depression, compared to the TAU group.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that combining ACT intervention into treatment as usual can play better results in enhancing the CER ability and PF of patients with BD in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.