ArticleFuture science OA2026
Evaluation of a multi-component dietary supplement combined with probiotic and omega-3 in individuals with self-reported symptoms of brain fog: an 8-week exploratory study.
Article in Future science OA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study used an open-label design, comprising a one-arm eight-weeks-long study, and aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the efficacy of a novel dietary supplement composition combined with probiotic and omega-3 to support brain health improvement in 39 participants with confirmed or suspected brain fog caused by trauma, disease, exposure to chemotherapeutics, or similar events.
methodsThe primary measure was the change from baseline in survey scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The secondary outcome was the change from baseline in test scores of the self-reported survey.
resultsThe results indicated significant improvements across all domains over time (p < 0.0001), with the most substantial changes occurring by Week 8. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant time effect (F [2.811, 105.4] = 43.09, p < 0.0001), suggesting that cognitive scores progressively improved across the weeks.
conclusionsThis exploratory research indicates that the trial kit was feasible, well tolerated, and associated with improvements in exploratory cognitive measures and perceived well-being over an eight-week period, although practice and placebo effects cannot be ruled out. The findings are hypothesis-generating and support further evaluations in randomized, placebo-controlled studies using well-characterized interventions, objective adherence measures, and biomarker-based outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.