ArticleScience progress
Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of post-intensive-care syndrome and post-sepsis syndrome in survivors of sepsis.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning prediction of postoperative pulmonary embolism: a multicenter external validation study highlighting inflammatory response and intraoperative hemodynamics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveIn the intensive care unit (ICU), sepsis is a leading cause of mortality, and survivors frequently experience serious long-term sequelae. In addition to identifying risk variables influencing post-sepsis syndrome (PSS) and post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), this study sought to present comprehensive data on the three-month prognostic and functional outcomes of sepsis patients in the ICU-a demographic frequently overlooked in long-term recovery discourse.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in the intensive care units of Jining Medical University Affiliated Hospital between April 2024 and July 2025, enrolling patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Follow-up assessments were conducted one and three months post-discharge via telephone or outpatient visits. The frequency of each dimension in PICS and PSS was investigated, alongside patients' health-related quality of life. Risk factors for the two syndromes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and stepwise multiple linear regression.ResultsSepsis survivors included in the one- and three-month follow-ups totaled 147 and 132, respectively. PICS and PSS had overall respective prevalence rates of 93.2-98.6% and 61.4-77.6%. Multivariable analyses revealed that body mass index (BMI), red blood cell (RBC) count, partial pressure of oxygen (PO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.