ArticleGut microbes2026
A systematic assessment of the short- and long-term effects of commonly used breast cancer chemotherapeutics on the gut microbiome‒blood‒brain axis of female mice.
Article in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy affects over 300,000 U.S. breast cancer patients, which disrupts the gut microbiome and induces gut inflammation-an effect hypothesized to drive gastrointestinal side effects (e.g., diarrhea, vomiting) experienced by 50%-80% of patients. Preclinical studies have found causal links amongst chemotherapy-induced gut microbiome disruption, systemic inflammation, and brain-mediated side effects. Therefore, the gut microbiome represents a therapeutic target to attenuate chemotherapy side effects. Because clinical populations are administered multiple chemotherapeutics in combination, a comprehensive understanding of which treatments disrupt the gut microbiome‒blood‒brain axis is lacking. Here, translationally-relevant regimens of four commonly used breast cancer chemotherapies (paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin) were given to adult female C57BL/6 mice, and inflammatory, metabolomics and/or bacteriome outcomes were measured in the gut, gut contents, blood, and brain tissues, along with a fatigue and anxiety-like behavioral assessment. Many inter-chemotherapy differences were observed but notable findings include prolonged circulation and central proinflammatory signals by paclitaxel and sustained disruption of the gut microbiome by cisplatin. In contrast, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin modestly disrupted the gut microbiome‒blood‒brain axis. Taken together, this study systematically identified that paclitaxel and cisplatin most robustly disrupted the gut microbiome‒blood‒brain axis, suggesting that those treated with these drugs may benefit the most from gut-targeted interventions for associated side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.