Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964700›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Simulation of Imatinib Pharmacokinetics in pregnant women with chronic myeloid leukemia in the third trimester.

Paola Mian, Christianne A R Lok, Anouk E W K Dontje, Jelmer R Prins, Thijs H Oude Munnink, Laurens Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne J Gordijn, Daan J Touw, Paul Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paola MianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands. p.mian@umcg.nl.
Christianne A R LokDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Centre of Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam, Location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. c.lok@nki.nl.
Anouk E W K DontjeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.
Jelmer R PrinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Thijs H Oude MunninkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands. t.h.oude.munnink@umcg.nl.
Laurens NieuwenhuizenDepartment of Internal Medicine Máxima MC Veldhoven/Eindhoven, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Laurens.Nieuwenhuizen@mmc.nl.
Sanne J GordijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. s.j.gordijn@umcg.nl.
Daan J TouwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands. d.j.touw@umcg.nl.
Paul MalikIonis, Carlsbad, USA. pmalik@ionis.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo simulate different dosing regimens of imatinib in third trimester pregnant women with CML that could meet plasma exposure targets for efficacy (Cmin≥1000 ng/mL) without compromising on fetal safety risk.MethodsAn initial physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model from Loer et al. was verified with routine non-pregnant PK data from a single center and then scaled to pregnancy by implementing pregnancy physiological and enzymatic changes relevant to imatinib PK. The pregnancy model was evaluated by comparing predictions with PK data observed in pregnant women receiving imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD). Simulations explored different dosing regimens that would meet Cmin≥1000 ng/mL without meaningfully higher AUC0-24h.ResultsPredictions for imatinib PK in the third trimester were well aligned with the observed data. Simulations indicate that 14.4% of third trimester pregnant women would achieve plasma Cmin≥1000 ng/mL at 400 mg QD, compared to 51.7% of non-pregnant female comparators receiving the same dose.ConclusionsWhile dividing 400 mg QD into 200 mg twice daily (BID) could modestly improve PK target attainment for third trimester pregnant women (28.5%), a dose of 300 mg BID could be needed to match Cmin target attainment (54.2%) and AUC0-24hwith expectations for a non-pregnant population receiving 400 mg QD. However, given the potential for increased fetal exposure, this approach requires careful risk-benefit assessment, and further research is warranted to establish the safest and most effective strategy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveModels, BiologicalPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase InhibitorsImatinibPharmacokineticsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41964700
PMCPMC13070068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.