ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Biologic Therapies and Small-Molecule Inhibitors for Dissecting Cellulitis of the Scalp: A Systematic Review.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is a chronic, relapsing neutrophilic scarring alopecia within the follicular occlusion spectrum. It shares clinical and pathogenic features with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), acne conglobata, and pilonidal sinus disease, reflecting activation of convergent inflammatory pathways. Therapeutic decision-making is challenging because of the absence of specific guidelines and approved treatments. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of advanced therapies-including biologic agents and small-molecule inhibitors-in DCS. In addition, therapeutic recommendations for disease management based on the available literature are proposed.
methodsA systematic review was performed to identify original studies, case series, and case reports reporting outcomes of tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-12/23, IL-17, IL-23 inhibitors, or small-molecule agents in DCS.
resultsForty-six studies comprising 125 patients were analyzed. TNFα inhibitors were the most frequently used therapies and demonstrated overall response rates exceeding 80%. Adalimumab and infliximab were the most commonly reported agents. IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors yielded encouraging results in refractory disease, whereas JAK inhibitors emerged as alternative options. The adverse event (AE) rate was 8.3%, predominantly mild or moderate.
conclusionsAdvanced therapies-particularly TNFα inhibitors-appear effective and well tolerated for severe or refractory DCS. Earlier initiation of treatment may help modify the inflammatory disease course and potentially prevent irreversible scarring alopecia; however, this proposed benefit remains hypothesis-generating and warrants prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.