ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
The impact of heat and cold events on direct, indirect, and intangible healthcare costs: a systematic review.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies have examined the effects of extreme temperatures on healthcare costs. However, most lack a detailed presentation of cost-related findings and often exclude cold-related effects. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the economic burden associated with both heat- and cold-related temperature exposure.
methodsLiterature published between 2014 and 2024 in English or German was searched in Medline (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by reference tracking and Internet searches. We included primary studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and determined a methodological quality score for each included article.
resultsIn total, 39 studies were included: 18 examined heat-related effects, another 18 analyzed combined heat- and cold-related effects, and 3 focused exclusively on cold-related effects. Furthermore, 18 studies focused on direct costs, 1 on indirect costs, 17 on intangible costs, and 3 on multiple cost types. Retrospective studies reported lower annual direct costs per 100,000 persons (mean €678,585; range €43,428–€2.06 million) than prospective studies (mean €1.13 million; range €14,433–€2.02 million). Indirect costs based on retrospective studies averaged €2,287 annually (range €72.75–€8,603), or 19.7 workdays lost per 100,000 persons. Intangible costs were reported using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost, and value of a statistical life. For example, retrospective evidence showed lower annual DALYs per 1,000 persons (mean 1.12; range 0.02–1.82) compared with prospective studies (mean 2.94; range 0.71–11.48). Methodological quality varied between 50 and 79%.
conclusionExtreme temperatures were shown to impact healthcare costs, representing a significant economic burden for healthcare systems. However, findings should be interpreted with caution because of the substantial heterogeneity across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964841What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.