ReviewThe oncologist2026
Landscape of T-cell engagers in solid tumors.
Review in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- T-Cell Engagers TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell engagers (TCEs) are a diverse class of bispecific and multispecific molecules that co-bind CD3 on T cells and tumor-associated antigens to form an immune synapse and induce targeted T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. While TCEs have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in hematologic malignancies, translation into solid tumors has been more challenging. Recent advances seen with tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma and tarlatamab in small-cell lung cancer have validated the approach and driven a rapidly expanding pipeline targeting other tumor associated antigens such as STEAP1, MUC16, and PRAME among others. Unique challenges in solid tumors include antigen heterogeneity and density thresholds, on-target/off-tumor toxicities, and physical and immunologic barriers within the tumor microenvironment. To address these, next-generation engineering strategies, such as half-life extension, protease- or context-dependent masking, multispecificity, and "armed" constructs incorporating cytokine or co-stimulatory payloads, are being developed to enhance intratumoral activity while limiting systemic toxicities. Combination regimens with checkpoint blockade, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and oncolytic platforms are also being actively investigated to overcome immune resistance and improve durability of response. Collectively, next-generation TCEs guided by rational target selection, context-dependent activation, and biomarker-driven patient stratification, are poised to broaden the reach of immunotherapy in solid tumors. In this review, we synthesize the recent advances that aim to expand the therapeutic window of TCEs for the treatment of solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.