SynthesisBMC public health2026
Strategies for recruitment of adolescent girls into physical activity programmes: a systematic review and regression analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, adolescent girls are one of the least active populations, with ~ 15% meeting WHO physical activity (PA) guidelines. This review offers the first quantitative synthesis of recruitment rates into PA randomised controlled trials targeting adolescent girls and identifies strategies which appear most promising, providing actionable guidance for PA providers and researchers.
methodsFive databases were searched, supplemented by citation hand-searches. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of girls aged 10–19 years with PA interventions lasting ≥ 4 weeks that reported recruitment rates or pre-determined recruitment goals; studies limited to clinical populations or athletes were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean recruitment rates overall and by subgroups such as age, socioeconomic status, and programme setting, while correlation and regression analyses examined associations between recruitment strategies and recruitment outcomes.
resultsFifteen thousand one hundred records were identified; 37 through citation search. After removing duplicates (n = 8,603), 6,407 records were screened by title and abstract and 134 full texts assessed. Following consensus, 27 studies were included; 23/27 were school-based. The mean recruitment rate was 62.6% (± 27.8), decreasing to 56.5% (± 35.0) in low-SES populations. Incomplete reporting of the recruitment funnel was common. Recruitment was higher amongst younger (65.9% ± 26.7) versus older (51.2% ± 32.1) girls. Teacher involvement was associated with improved recruitment: when teachers were financially supported to organise activities (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.005) or followed up for consent with absent girls (R2 = 0.25, p = 0.048). Recruitment goals were achieved in 68% of studies, particularly those using researcher presentations or PA taster sessions (r = 0.52, p = 0.041). School-based programmes during class time recruited more effectively (62.3% ± 28.1) than those offered at optional times (54.9% ± 30.9). Incentives for girls was associated with the lowest recruitment rates (51.2% ± 32.1) and reduced retention (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.024). Mean retention was high (84.9% ± 13.3); better in school-based (86.0% ± 12.6) versus non-school-based (81.2% ± 16.3) programmes and improved when fitness assessments were included (R2 = 0.24, p = 0.020).
conclusionRecruiting adolescent girls into PA programmes is feasible but challenging. Teacher engagement, integrating PA into school timetables, and interactive approaches (presentations, tasters) emerged as potentially promising strategies for recruiting girls, though the evidence base was predominantly school-based and reporting of recruitment strategies was often incomplete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.