SynthesisBMC oral health2026
The effect of non-invasive physical interventions for accelerating tooth movement on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRoot resorption is one of the most common complications following orthodontic treatment, and severe cases may compromise tooth stability and function. Over the past decades, pharmacological, surgical, and non-invasive physical interventions have been explored to mitigate orthodontically induced root resorption. Among these approaches, non-invasive physical interventions have attracted increasing attention because of their favorable safety profile and clinical convenience. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of non-invasive physical interventions on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) using a network meta-analysis, and to identify the most effective intervention in order to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across seven electronic databases from their inception to identify studies investigating the effects of representative physical interventions on OIIRR. Study selection was performed in accordance with the Cochrane System Evaluator’s Manual for Systematic Reviews. Following the PRISMA guidelines, statistical heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the I² statistic. A random-effects model was applied when I² > 50%. Network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. Forest plots were generated using RevMan 5.4.
resultsA total of 1,135 records were screened, focusing on interventions including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), light-emitting diode (LED) therapy, and vibration. Twelve studies reporting OIIRR as an outcome measure were ultimately included. The results demonstrated that LED therapy significantly reduced OIIRR following orthodontic treatment (MD = − 0.14 mm3, 95% CI [− 0.18, − 0.10], p < 0.00001). Although LLLT (SMD = − 0.31, 95% CI [− 0.77, 0.14], p = 0.17) and vibration (SMD = − 1.67, 95% CI [− 3.54, 0.20], p = 0.08) showed a tendency toward reduced root resorption, these effects were not statistically significant. According to the SUCRA ranking, LED achieved a SUCRA value of 75.9 and a mean rank of 1.7, indicating a relative advantage over the other interventions in reducing OIIRR.
conclusionsLED therapy appears to be effective in alleviating orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. However, although the reduction in OIIRR was statistically significant, whether the magnitude of this effect translates into clinically meaningful benefits remains uncertain. Further well-designed studies are warranted to determine optimal device parameters and application protocols to maximize therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.