ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
Assessing family quality of life in families of people with brain injuries: a Delphi study.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired brain injury (ABI) has a profound impact on the lives of survivors and their loved ones. However, there is a paucity of research on the quality of life of the whole family. Also, there are no instruments for assessing family quality of life (FQoL) from a holistic and systemic perspective after ABI in the Spanish context. The goal of this study was to identify a set of indicators and items of FQoL for this population in order to develop a preliminary version of such an assessment tool. A modified Delphi study was conducted with twelve social and healthcare professionals (70% women; age: M = 42.52, SD = 6.39) from ABI rehabilitation services and organizations (four psychologists, three neuropsychologists, three social workers, one nurse and one physiotherapist), who were asked to assess a pool of items throughout three rounds according to two criteria (importance and sensitivity). Descriptive analysis and percentage of agreement were employed to select the best items, as well as coefficients of concordance for the final pool of items. As a result, a pool of 71 items for five domains—Individual well-being, Family relationships, Family resources, Community relationships, and Community resources—was obtained. The findings of this study provided content validity evidence for a field test version of a FQoL tool, which may help to inform assessment and family-centered support planning for people with ABI and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.