ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of protein extraction from skin tape strips for biomarker assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stratum corneum tape-stripping is a non-invasive alternative to biopsies for biomarker analysis in inflammatory skin diseases, but low-abundance protein detection is challenging. High extraction yield is therefore crucial, yet extraction protocols vary. Because total protein collected on the tapes is commonly used for biomarker normalization, factors influencing its measurement can impact data interpretation. We sought to investigate how extraction conditions such as buffer type, volume, and sonication time affect both total protein and cytokine biomarker yield. Sequential tape strips were collected from lesional skin of 19 patients with chronic hand eczema and matched skin sites in 13 healthy controls. Tapes were cut for equal allocation across experimental conditions. Total protein was measured by the Micro BCA assay and biomarkers by the ELISA and MSD immunoassays, with blank tapes and buffers as controls. T-PER buffer with protease inhibitor CAA yielded higher cytokine levels than PBS or PBS-Tween ± CAA, but also increased BCA assay background levels. Longer sonication and smaller extraction volumes exacerbated background without improving cytokine yield. Hence, normalization of biomarker levels may be confounded by these methodological factors. Considering the buffer, its volume, sonication time, and the inclusion of negative controls is therefore instrumental when designing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.