Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965771›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026

Collaboration in team outpatient eating disorder care: clinician's perspectives.

Megan Bray, Gabriella Heruc, Olivia R L Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan BraySchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. m.bray@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4941-3829
Gabriella HerucEating disorders and Nutrition Research Group (ENRG), School of Medicine, Translational Health and Medical Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-6828
Olivia R L WrightSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-6101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines recommend team outpatient eating disorder treatment, yet the organisation and delivery of team care vary considerably in practice. This qualitative study explored clinicians’ attitudes toward and experiences of team outpatient eating disorder treatment, including multidisciplinary and interprofessional care. Nineteen Australian clinicians (dietitians, mental health professionals, and general practitioners) with at least two years’ experience working in outpatient eating disorder teams participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes and three sub-themes were identified. Theme 1, Preference for Interprofessional Ways of Working, captured clinicians’ preference for highly integrated and collaborative approaches, including perceived benefits for team functioning, clinician wellbeing, and client care; the related sub-theme Dismantle Systemic Hierarchies to Foster Trust, Respect, and Collaboration highlighted structural barriers to collaboration. Theme 2, Interprofessional Education (IPE) as the Foundation for Collaborative Practice, emphasised IPE as a key enabler of collaborative capacity; while its sub-theme IPE Develops Shared Philosophies and Values described the role of IPE in developing shared conceptual and philosophical foundations for collaborative care. Theme 3, Communication as the Strategy for Sustaining Collaborative Practice, underscored communication as central to day-to-day coordination; its sub-theme Leverage Role Overlap Through Effective Communication illustrated how communication supported role integration. Overall, clinicians described highly collaborative team care as desirable, and shaped by education, communication infrastructure, and systemic constraints. Future research should examine approaches to strengthen interprofessional education, improve communication systems and structures, and support collaboration within existing treatment models and service contexts.

Indexed as

Feeding and eating disordersInterdisciplinary communicationInterprofessional educationInterprofessional relationsPatient care team

Identifiers

PMID41965771
PMCPMC13185375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.