ArticleScientific reports2026
Advancing cardiovascular screening: deep learning-based heart-sound classification using SMOTE and temporal modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and reliable detection of cardiac murmurs from phonocardiogram (PCG) recordings is essential for improving cardiovascular screening and supporting diagnosis in primary care. However, automated murmur classification remains challenging due to signal variability, class imbalance, and temporal dependence within heart-sound sequences. This study presents a leakage-safe heart-sound classification framework that combines peak-based segmentation, Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) feature extraction, Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE)–based class balancing, and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)–driven temporal modeling. Segmentation was performed around cardiac onset peaks, and evaluation was conducted using recording-level splits for the PhysioNet 2016 dataset and patient-level splits for the PhysioNet 2022 dataset to prevent segment correlation bias. The proposed model achieved 98.6% accuracy (precision = 98.26%, recall = 98.95%, F1-score = 98.61%) on PhysioNet 2022, and 98.5% accuracy (precision = 98.49%, recall = 98.52%, F1-score = 98.50%) on PhysioNet 2016, demonstrating consistently high performance across datasets with different class distributions. These results indicate that combining temporal modeling with balanced learning improves robustness in murmur detection. The findings highlight the potential of PCG-based deep learning systems to support scalable, non-invasive cardiac screening, particularly in settings with limited access to specialist assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.