ArticleNutrition & metabolism2026
Acute effects of "exercise snacks" during prolonged sitting on hemodynamics and peripheral vascular function: a three-level meta-analysis.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged sitting acutely impairs flow-mediated dilation (FMD) by reducing peripheral blood flow and vascular shear stress. Interspersing prolonged sitting with short bouts of physical activity (i.e., “exercise snacks” or sedentary breaks) has been proposed as a strategy to mitigate these adverse effects. However, previous meta-analyses have been limited by small sample sizes and by inadequate handling of the statistical dependency arising from multiple effect sizes within studies, thereby limiting the robustness of their conclusions.
methodsWe followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD420261282295). We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library (up to September 30, 2025) for randomized crossover or parallel controlled trials involving adults aged ≥ 18 years. Eligible studies compared the effects of sedentary breaks with prolonged sitting on acute hemodynamic and peripheral vascular outcomes. Data were pooled using a three-level random-effects model in R (metafor package) to account for statistical dependency, and the results were compared with those from traditional two-level models. We also reported 95% prediction intervals and conducted outlier diagnostics, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, meta-regressions, and publication bias assessments.
resultsA total of 36 studies comprising 632 participants were included. Compared with prolonged sitting, sedentary breaks significantly improved flow-mediated dilation (Hedges’ g = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.06–0.81]; P = 0.02; GRADE: Moderate), increased peripheral blood flow (g = 0.46 [0.22–0.71]; P < 0.001; GRADE: Moderate), and reduced systolic blood pressure (MD = − 1.67 mm Hg [95% CI, − 2.81 to − 0.52]; P < 0.001; GRADE: Moderate). Shear rate increased in the primary analysis (g = 0.32 [0.09–0.54]; P = 0.008; GRADE: Very Low) but became non-significant after trim-and-fill ([Formula: see text]) adjustment, suggesting potential small-study effects. Moderator and meta-regression analyses indicated that shear rate improvements were influenced by the type of break (stair climbing yielded the largest effect) and were positively correlated with break duration. Improvements in peripheral blood flow were associated with the total duration of sitting. Among the additional hemodynamic and vascular outcomes, heart rate increased slightly (GRADE: Very Low), whereas mean arterial pressure (GRADE: Moderate), diastolic blood pressure (GRADE: Moderate), and peripheral arterial diameter (GRADE: Moderate) showed no significant consistent changes.
conclusionsBreaking up prolonged sitting with short bouts of physical activity (“exercise snacks”) acutely improves flow-mediated dilation and peripheral blood flow, and is associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in systolic blood pressure. Mean arterial pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and peripheral arterial diameter did not show consistent significant changes. Findings for shear rate and heart rate were sensitive to bias correction and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Activity breaks involving large muscle groups (e.g., stair climbing), performed for 2–5 min every 30–60 min, may be particularly beneficial for vascular protection. Where feasible, reducing total sedentary time and avoiding prolonged uninterrupted sitting may also be important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.