ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a prediction model for the risk of relapse in psoriasis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study collected and analyzed clinical data of psoriasis patients to develop and validate a psoriasis relapse risk prediction model. It aims to support early relapse risk assessment in clinical practice and inform the design of preventive interventions. To develop and validate a risk prediction model for psoriasis relapse. A convenience sampling method was used to select 504 psoriasis patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in China between January 2022 and December 2024, including 353 cases in the training set and 151 cases in the testing set. Independent risk factors for psoriasis relapse were identified through univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis to develop a prediction model. A nomogram and SHAP summary plot were generated for model visualization, and the model's goodness of fit and discriminative ability were evaluated. The 1-year relapse rate of psoriasis patients after treatment was 66.67%. Logistic regression identified six independent risk factors for psoriasis relapse: BMI, diabetes, biologic use, smoking, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), and non-standard medication, all of which were incorporated into the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for the training and testing sets were 0.767 [95% CI 0.715-0.818] and 0.704 [95% CI 0.620-0.789], respectively. The model showed moderate discrimination and good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed clinically meaningful net benefit in both training and test sets. The predictive model for psoriasis relapse risk established in this study demonstrated only moderate predictive performance. This model can serve as a preliminary exploratory tool, providing a certain degree of quantitative reference for assessing the risk of psoriasis relapse; however, rigorous external validation in independent multicenter cohorts is still required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.