Evidence mapPaperPMID 41966674Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2026

Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Challenges.

Duc-Hiep Bach, Bui Van Giang, Thanh Liem Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duc-Hiep BachVinmec Research Institute of Stem Cell and Gene Technology, College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Vinhomes Ocean Park, Gia Lam District, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam. hiep.bd@vinuni.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-3137
Bui Van GiangDepartment of Radiology, International Vinmec Hospital, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam. giang.bv@vinuni.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-4357
Thanh Liem NguyenVinmec Research Institute of Stem Cell and Gene Technology, College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Vinhomes Ocean Park, Gia Lam District, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam. Liem.nt@vinuni.edu.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5553-2164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes devastating and permanent neurological disability, with no restorative treatments currently available. Cell-based therapies have long been regarded as the most promising regenerative strategy, demonstrating robust functional improvement in preclinical models. However, clinical outcomes have been inconsistent, exposing a persistent translational gap. This review critically appraises leading cell therapy platforms, ranging from mesenchymal and neural stem cells to next-generation engineered tissues. We dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying therapeutic efficacy and analyze key translational barriers, including GMP manufacturing, potency assay development, and clinical trial design. Integrating lessons from past failures with emerging advances in imaging biomarkers and immune-microenvironment modulation, we propose a strategic roadmap framed by a “renovate-and-rebuild” paradigm. We identify timing-by-mechanism mismatches and inadequate scar remodeling as central drivers of variable efficacy, and introduce a biomarker-gated indication algorithm to align therapies with lesion biology. Collectively, these insights argue for reframing SCI repair as a staged, biology-matched process rather than a single-shot intervention.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapySpinal Cord InjuriesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansCell-based therapyExtracellular vesiclesNeural tissue engineeringSpinal cord injuryTranslational barriers

Identifiers

PMID41966674
PMCPMC13184076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.