ArticleJournal of medical entomology2026
Tick-borne pathogens in Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) and Ixodes inopinatus × I. ricinus hybrids in Central Europe: no link to bird diversity or abundance.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tick-borne pathogens in Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) and Ixodes inopinatus × I. ricinus hybrids in Central Europe: no link to bird diversity or abundance.Journal of medical entomology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the presence of Ixodes inopinatus in Central Europe has not been conclusively demonstrated, recent studies have provided evidence of Ixodes ricinus with introgressed I. inopinatus TROSPA alleles in the Czech Republic. Migratory birds have been hypothesized to carry I. inopinatus from North Africa to more northern regions, potentially leading to hybridization with I. ricinus in Southern and possibly Central Europe. In this study, we screened 659 tick nymphs collected from six sites in the Czech Republic, which were selected based on the diversity and abundance of birds and classified as bird-poor and bird-rich habitats. We did not detect any I. inopinatus, but hybrid tick prevalence (individuals bearing different TROSPA alleles) ranged from 0.7% to 5.5% per site and was not associated with habitat type. We found a decline in the occurrence of hybrids along a south-to-north latitudinal gradient. Overall, 22.9% of ticks tested positive for at least one tick-borne pathogen, with a higher prevalence in I. inopinatus/ricinus hybrids (30%) than in I. ricinus (22.7%). Hybrid ticks harbored Borrelia burgdorferi s. l., B. miyamotoi, and Rickettsia helvetica. In I. ricinus, B. burgdorferi s. l. was the most prevalent pathogen (11.8%), and by genospecies dominated by B. afzelii, followed by Rickettsia spp. (5.6%), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (4.7%, mostly ecotype I), and B. miyamotoi (2.5%), with several co-infection patterns observed. One tick was positive for Neoehrlichia mikurensis. The prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia miyamotoi, Borrelia burgdorferi s. l., and Rickettsia spp. substantially varied among sites and was independent of habitat type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.