ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Classification of fallers in Parkinson's disease through machine learning based feature analysis.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classification of fallers in Parkinson's disease (PD) is challenging due to the heterogenous motor and non-motor symptoms. We developed a machine learning model integrating clinical and gait data to identify key clinical markers of faller status in PD. Of 468 participants, 396 with complete data were analyzed, with 298 assigned to training from one center and 98 to external validation from the other. Clinical assessments and GAITRite-derived gait metrics were obtained. Fall history classified participants as PD fallers, PD non-fallers, or healthy controls. Features were selected through statistical and importance-based approaches, and seven machine learning algorithms were trained. The Extra Trees classifier utilizing statistics-based feature selection demonstrated the highest performance (accuracy 88% internal, 89% external). Three principal domains consistently emerged: fear of falling (FoF), balance/gait measures (stride length, velocity, 360° rotation), and autonomic dysfunction. These findings support the feasibility of externally validated, multidomain machine learning-based faller classification in PD.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.