ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Ecological change may be a common initiator of evolutionary pollinator shifts.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Although evolutionary pollinator shifts are accepted as major sources of floral and species diversity in angiosperms, the mechanisms triggering pollinator shifts remain largely unexplored. In 1970, Stebbins proposed that ecological change may be a common initiator of evolutionary pollinator shifts, but empirical tests of Stebbins' hypothesis remain scarce. The lack of studies exploring the drivers of pollinator shifts likely stem from the lack of a clear definition of ecological change, and the inherent challenges of studying past evolutionary events empirically. I here propose a definition of ecological change as any abiotic or biotic macro- or microecological, extrinsic or intrinsic change that significantly alters the effectiveness of a taxon's ancestral pollinator(s). Because such ecological change may happen at different scales, I argue that taking an integrative macro-micro-evolutionary approach will allow us to test where and when which type of ecological change is a common driver of pollinator shifts. I propose macroevolutionary tests of abiotic macroecological change as a driver of pollinator shifts as the easiest and most effective method, allowing for the comparison of a large number of independent shifts to establish whether there are broad generalities in evolutionary pollinator shifts, and determine when and where there are not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.