ReviewCardiovascular toxicology2026
Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Cardiovascular Disease: An Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factor.
Review in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro- and Nanoplastics in Cardiovascular Toxicology: Human Tissue Detection, Clinical Phenotypes, and Adverse Outcome Signals.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Environmental Exposure to Micro- and Nanoplastics: Linking Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Through Shared Biological Pathways-A Critical Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Bibliometric Review and Knowledge Mapping of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Cardiovascular Research.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs) have become pervasive contaminants in air, water, and food, leading to continuous human exposure. Contrary to the long-standing assumption that these particles are biologically inert, accumulating evidence now shows that MNPs cross epithelial and endothelial barriers, circulate systemically, and accumulate in cardiovascular tissues. Experimental, translational, and early clinical studies demonstrate that some MNPs can induce oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, mitochondrial injury, immune activation, and coagulation pathway dysregulation, mechanisms that converge on atherosclerotic development and progression, plaque destabilization, atherothrombosis, and cardiac remodeling. Recent human data identifying MNPs in carotid and coronary plaques, arterial specimens, thrombi, and cardiac tissues provide direct proof-of-concept for their cardiovascular involvement. These findings position MNPs as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, with implications for prevention, patient risk stratification, and environmental health policy. Major knowledge gaps remain, including the absence of standardized biomarkers of exposure, dose–response quantification, and longitudinal clinical cohorts. Recognizing environmental plastics as cardiovascular toxins demands urgent, multidisciplinary investigation and integration of environmental exposure into cardiovascular disease prevention frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.