ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026
Implementing the EU HTA regulation and joint clinical assessment: a multi-stakeholder perspective from Italy.
Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Post-Authorisation Maze: Mapping of European Pharmaceutical Market Access Pathways in the Early JCA Era.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Supporting the Implementation and Addressing the Challenges of the EU HTA Regulation.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment (HTAR), which applies as of January 2025, introduces the Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) for selected health technologies and establishes a stakeholder network. This study aims to evaluate the expected impact of the implementation of the HTAR from a multi-stakeholder perspective, using Italy as a case study.
methodsA scoping literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to inform the development of an interview guide. Target participants included Italian stakeholder representatives with an interest in the HTAR. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually at the end of 2024. The questions were categorized into three main topics: expected benefits and opportunities; foreseen risks or challenges; recommended actions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis techniques.
resultsThirteen participants included representatives from national and regional HTA bodies, health technology developers' associations, health professional associations, patient organizations, and HTA experts. The JCA is expected to enhance the quality of clinical assessment and to result in faster and more equitable access to health innovations. However, the timing will depend on the extent to which Member States require complementary analyses. Health technology developers benefit from submitting a single JCA dossier, but often cope with limited evidence and short-term deadlines. The interviewees recommended harmonizing evidence standards, investing in HTA education and training, and fostering strategic stakeholder collaborations. DISCUSSION: The process of harmonization induced by the HTAR is beneficial to standardize clinical assessment at the EU level, but needs to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.