ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Vocal Tract Fat Distribution and Patient Tolerance to Transnasal Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the correlation between vocal tract fat volume and patient tolerance to office-based laryngeal surgery using the transnasal approach.
methodsThe medical records and video recordings of all patients who underwent office-based laryngeal surgery (OBLS) between April 2024 and January 2026 were reviewed. Demographic data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), history of smoking, history of reflux disease, allergy, voice diagnosis, and type of OBLS. Three fat compartments were analyzed: (1) parapharyngeal fat volume at the palatal level, (2) parapharyngeal fat at the glossal level, and (3) the pre-epiglottic adipose tissue. Patient tolerance was evaluated using the IOWA Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
resultsForty patients were included in the study. The mean IOWA score of the total group was 2.55 ± 0.68, and the mean VAS tolerance score was 8.70 ± 1.65. Linear regression analysis accounting for potential confounding factors showed a moderate, negative, statistically significant correlation between the volume of parapharyngeal fat at the level of the palate and IOWA scale score (adjusted coefficient β = -0.567, p = 0.049). There was also a mild, negative, non-significant correlation between the volume of parapharyngeal fat at the level of the palate and VAS scores (adjusted coefficient β = -0.251, p = 0.211).
conclusionAn increase in parapharyngeal fat volume at the level of the palate was associated with a decrease in IOWA scale score, suggesting reduced tolerance to OBLS. A study with a larger sample size is needed to draw stronger conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.