Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968877›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Learning to be unfaithful - preferences and flower constancy of Eristalis tenax (Syrphidae) decrease with experience.

Jakub Štenc, Alice Haveldová, Eva Matoušková, Zdeněk Janovský

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakub ŠtencDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 41 Prague, Czech Republic.
Alice HaveldováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 41 Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva MatouškováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 41 Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdeněk JanovskýSvatý Jan t. Krsovice 1, CZ-285 04 Uhlířské Janovice, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 842120Univerzita Karlova v PrazeUniverzita Karlova v Praze 842120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollinators exhibit preferences and flower constancy (i.e. the proportion of visits to the same plant species) toward particular floral traits, which drive their decisions while foraging between flowers. Furthermore, pollinators adjust their preferences and flower constancy based on their experience with the flower reward, shaping their foraging behaviour and consequently pollen transfer. However, while evidence of the pollinators learning from foraging is well known for bees, evidence for hoverflies is only slowly increasing although they represent one of the most abundant pollinator groups in temperate zones. We compared the preferences and flower constancy of flower naive and experienced individuals of the drone fly Eristalis tenax in controlled, full-factorial experiments using artificial flowers differing in colour and size. Our results show that previous experience with flowers in an environment rich in flowering species decreased flower constancy and changed the preferences of E. tenax. We discuss the effect of changes in preference and constancy on E. tenax foraging among flowering plants.

Indexed as

DipteraFlowersLearningPollinationAnimalsArtificial flowersHoverfliesPlant–pollinator interactionPlant specializationPollinationReward

Identifiers

PMID41968877
PMCPMC13245904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.