ReviewCancer biology & medicine2026
The role of radiomics in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Review in Cancer biology & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer exhibits profound biological and spatial heterogeneity, which contributes to variable responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and challenges precision treatment planning. Radiomics, an emerging discipline that converts standard medical images into high-dimensional quantitative data, offers a non-invasive and reproducible means to capture tumor phenotype, heterogeneity, and treatment-induced changes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in radiomics for breast cancer NAC, emphasizing the roles in predicting a pathologic complete response (pCR), monitoring early therapeutic efficacy, and quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity. Among imaging modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics, particularly utilizing dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequences, demonstrates robust predictive performance for the pCR, with multi-center studies reporting area under the curve (AUC) values >0.80. Longitudinal and delta-radiomics approaches further enhance early response evaluation by tracking temporal alterations in imaging features that precede measurable morphologic regression. Radiomic assessment of tumor heterogeneity, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), reveals strong associations with immune infiltration, metabolic reprogramming, and therapeutic resistance, providing mechanistic insight into radiomic biomarkers. Integrative multi-omics frameworks, combining radiomics with genomics, transcriptomics and pathomics, are increasingly elucidating the biological underpinnings of imaging phenotypes, improving both model interpretability and clinical relevance. Despite these advances, widespread clinical adoption of radiomics is limited by methodologic variability, lack of standardization, and insufficient external validation. Future efforts should focus on harmonized imaging protocols, explainable artificial intelligence, and prospective multi-center trials to translate radiomics into a clinically actionable tool. Collectively, radiomics represents a transformative approach for individualized response prediction and dynamic treatment optimization in precision breast cancer management (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.