ReviewFrontiers in aging2026
Effects of exercise training on frail older adults with heart failure: a systematic-review.
Review in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent in older adults and is frequently associated with frailty, leading to increased morbidity, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Exercise training (ET) has demonstrated benefits in HF and frailty separately, but its effects in frail older adults with HF have not been extensively evaluated. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of ET on health outcomes in frail older patients with HF. Methods: A systematic review of interventional studies was conducted following PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Scielo were searched up to March 2026. Inclusion criteria were: (a) intervention studies involving frail adults aged ≥60 years with HF, (b) evaluation of chronic effects of ET on health outcomes, and (c) publication in English. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by four reviewers, with a fifth reviewer resolving disagreements. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the PEDro scale. Results: Six investigations were included. Overall quality assessment results ranged from 4 to 7. Studies were conducted in Japan and the United States. All were randomized controlled trials with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 337 participants (mean age 72.5 years). Frailty was assessed using the Frailty Phenotype, Frailty Index, and Short Physical Performance Battery. ET interventions varied in duration and modality, and were mostly characterized by multicomponent (e.g., resistance, endurance, flexibility) exercise training protocols. Adverse events were infrequent; one study reported musculoskeletal pain in 25% of participants. ET significantly improved HF symptoms, frailty status, physical function (mobility, muscle strength, aerobic capacity), physical activity levels, quality of life, and depressive symptoms. Improvements in hemoglobin and cholesterol were also observed. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in interventions and outcome measures. Conclusion: Cardiac rehabilitation programs based on ET protocols appear to improve clinical and functional outcomes in frail older adults with HF. However, evidence is limited by the small number of studies, variability in intervention protocols, and heterogeneity in outcome assessment. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal ET strategies for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.