Evidence mapPaperPMID 41969621Full record

ArticleObesity pillars2026

Long term patient perspectives following all types of bariatric surgery: A 19-year follow-up study.

G Konings, M Drukker, R Severeijns, R Ponds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity pillars, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G KoningsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
M DrukkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
R SevereijnsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
R PondsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery effectively treats severe obesity. However, long-term data on weight maintenance and patient well-being remain scarce. This study assessed patients' perspectives on their bariatric trajectory and outcomes of their historical and current status across multiple domains, irrespective of surgical procedure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients who were referred to the Department of Medical Psychology for bariatric screening between 1998 and 2004. Of the 547 referred patients, eligible participants received a survey after informed consent addressing weight outcomes, current eating patterns, dietary guidelines adherence, expectation fulfillment, satisfaction, and peer advice. Results: Sixty-two participants completed survey. Mean postoperative time since the initial surgery was 19 years (range 6-27). Mean preoperative weight decreased 33%, from 144.2 to 97.5 kg. Preoperative Body Mass Index decreased from 50.3 to 34.0 kg/m Conclusion: After 19 years, weight loss, healthy eating and adherence to advice varied, yet most participants were satisfied regardless of weight loss or reoperation. We plea for lifelong follow-up care to optimize bariatric results regardless type of surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryHealth behaviorsLong-term outcomesPatient perspective

Identifiers

PMID41969621
PMCPMC13066946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.