ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Acceptability of a Chlamydia Vaccine Among Young Women and Men in Birmingham, Alabama, USA: 2023-2025.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chlamydia infection remains a global health concern, justifying the need for a chlamydia vaccine. Chlamydia infection rates are highest among young women and men; thus, they would be the target populations for vaccination. However, vaccine availability does not ensure uptake. We conducted a survey among youth to identify factors that may influence chlamydia vaccine acceptability. Methods: Females and males aged 16-29 years seen for care in adolescent, gynecology, student health, and sexual health clinics completed a computer-assisted survey, collecting information on sexual health, health care utilization, vaccination history, and factors related to chlamydia and vaccine acceptability. Results: Of 399 female and 221 male participants, most (93.2%) had heard of chlamydia, 28.1% reported prior chlamydia infection, and 52.6% believed they could acquire chlamydia infection. Interest in chlamydia vaccination was reported by 42.4% females and associated with non-Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, clinic site, previous influenza or COVID-19 vaccination, and awareness of human papillomavirus vaccination. Among males, 44.8% reported chlamydia vaccination interest that was associated with ethnicity, human papillomavirus vaccine awareness, chlamydia awareness, prior chlamydia infection, and possibility of acquiring chlamydia infection. Among all participants, most (82.5%) reported their main motivation for vaccination was to protect themselves and major barriers were concerns about safety (50.0%) and cost (23.1%). The majority (66.0%) reported health care providers as the main resource for vaccine information and were more likely to get vaccinated if recommended by them. Conclusions: Less than half of surveyed youth were interested in receiving a chlamydia vaccine. Findings will guide strategies for chlamydia vaccine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.