ArticleInternet interventions2026
Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for detection of high-risk depression and anxiety in Korean community settings.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smartphones generate continuous behavioral signals such as mobility and activity patterns, offering scalable opportunities for monitoring mental health in community settings. Digital phenotyping approaches that integrate passive sensing with brief self-report measures may enable early identification of individuals at high risk for depression and anxiety without reliance on additional wearable devices. Method: We prospectively evaluated a smartphone-based digital phenotyping framework in 455 community-dwelling adults in Korea who contributed 28 days of passive Global Positioning System and accelerometer data, daily self-report microsurveys, and weekly PHQ-9/GAD-7 assessments for screening high-risk depression and anxiety. Machine learning models were compared across active-only, passive-only, and combined feature sets. After applying predefined coverage criteria (≥60% passive-data coverage and ≥ 60% corresponding active-data availability), 277 participants were included in the depression cohort and 275 in the anxiety cohort. Results: Passive features capturing mobility, activity regularity, and sleep-related behaviors were derived, and machine learning models were trained using active-only, passive-only, and combined feature sets. For depression, combined models achieved the best performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 and APs ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 across classifiers. Similar patterns were observed for anxiety, with AUCs up to 0.86 and APs up to 0.95. Ablation analyses identified robust deployment conditions relevant to clinical screening, including tolerance to missing data and short look-back windows. Discussion: These findings support the practical utility of smartphone-based digital phenotyping pipelines that integrate passive behavioral signals with brief self-reports for scalable screening for high-risk depression and anxiety in real-world environments, and they may inform future just-in-time mental health intervention systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.