ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Investigating the coach's eye when evaluating and selecting 3 × 3 basketball players.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although recent studies recommend making multidimensional selection decisions based on subjective and objective data, in practical settings coaches often decide subjectively. When trying to understand coaches' selection decisions, it is important to regard different theories of decision-making when analyzing predictors. Thus, this study examined predictors for selection decisions by comparing approaches of the theory of both unbounded (logistic regression) and bounded rationality (fast-and-frugal tree, FFTree). Accordingly, this study's aim was twofold: (1) investigate talent aspects in 3 × 3 basketball, and (2) compare different statistical approaches to this investigation. Regarding the underlying process of selection decisions, analyses focused on interrater agreement of subjective assessments and the relevance of different talent aspects. A total of 46 3 × 3 basketball players (female
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.