ReviewTranslational and clinical pharmacology2026
The pH factor: unraveling drug-drug interactions in protein kinase inhibitors through the regulatory lens.
Review in Translational and clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a significant concern in clinical practice, DDIs might be relevant when drugs with pH-dependent solubility are co-administered with gastric acid-reducing agents (ARAs) such as histamine, H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. One class prone to such DDI at the absorption phase are the weakly basic protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs). The aim of this work is to review recent Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) submissions for PKIs and evaluate the various approaches by drug developers to characterize pH-dependent DDI liability potentially affecting efficacy in this class of drugs and assess how this impacts the labelling. For this purpose, 32 FDA New Drug Applications (NDAs) and 25 EMA Market Authorization Applications of PKIs in the last 5 years (2019 through 2024) were reviewed More than two-thirds of the submissions included a dedicated clinical DDI studies with an ARA, which remains the most frequent approach to evaluating gastric pH-dependent DDIs among the PKIs investigated, albeit model-informed drug development approaches are also attempted by applicants in about 20% of the submissions. In cases where no clinical DDI study was submitted and alternative approaches taken, this was accepted by the approving agencies. Only the complete absence of data on the DDI potential triggered the request to provide the information post-marketing. A risk-based approach, considering the drug's properties and patient population, is crucial for determining the need for a clinical DDI study and should be discussed with the agencies during drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.