ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Association of transitions in frailty with dementia risk: findings from two longitudinal cohort studies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that frailty is an important risk factor for dementia. Frailty is a dynamic condition that may progress or improve. However, the impact of frailty transitions on dementia risk has not been sufficiently examined. Methods: We analyzed data from two prospective cohorts. Frailty status was assessed using the Frailty Index (FI) and categorized into three groups: robust, pre-frail, and frail. Transitions in frailty status were evaluated based on FI at baseline and at a second assessment. The outcome was dementia, which was ascertained by self-reported physician diagnosis. To adjust for potential confounders, a directed acyclic graph was drawn, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 8,353 participants were included in the analysis of transitions in frailty status. Compared with stable robust participants, robust participants who progressed to pre-frail or frail had an increased risk of dementia (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.18-2.68, Conclusion: Progression in frailty status was associated with an increased risk of dementia compared with stable robust or stable pre-frail status, whereas recovery from pre-frail or frail status was not associated with a significant reduction in dementia risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.