ReviewCirculation reports2026
Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Japan: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Review in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Filtering Function to Reduce Radiation Exposure During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.Circulation reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapeutic strategy, with pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone of ablative therapy. Although radiofrequency and cryothermal energies have been the main energy sources, the past decade has witnessed remarkable scientific progress and growing interest in pulsed field ablation (PFA) as a novel energy modality, leading to the recent clinical adoption of PFA technologies for AF treatment. In Japan, PFA was introduced into clinical practice in 2024 and has been rapidly accepted. Unlike traditional thermal energies, PFA uses pulsed electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, selectively targeting myocardial tissue while preserving adjacent structures from thermal or mechanical injury. Offering procedural efficacy comparable to conventional thermal ablation, PFA distinguishes itself by enabling shorter procedure times and reducing the risk of complications. This review summarizes the mechanisms of PFA, currently available systems in Japan, reported clinical outcomes and complications, as well as limitations and future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.