ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Reframing the Kirkpatrick model for evaluating humanistic care training in nursing: a context-sensitive integrative perspective.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This perspective article critically examines the application of the Kirkpatrick model (KM) to humanistic care training in hospital-based nursing practice. While KM is widely used as a multi-level evaluation framework, its conventional linear interpretation may be insufficient for assessing relational competencies within complex clinical systems. Drawing on contemporary educational evaluation theory and empirical nursing education research, we argue that KM should be reconceptualized as a context-sensitive and probabilistic framework rather than a deterministic causal sequence. We scrutinize methodological challenges across all four levels-reaction, learning, behavior, and results-with particular emphasis on behavioral transfer, causal attribution, contextual confounding, and the limitations of self-reported measures. To enhance methodological rigor and practical applicability, we propose minimum validity conditions for each level and introduce an operationalized evaluation matrix tailored to humanistic care training. We further discuss the integration of technology-enhanced modalities, including simulation and virtual reality, as tools for strengthening multi-level evaluation. By reframing KM through an integrative health sciences lens, this perspective article provides structured, actionable guidance for designing and interpreting evaluation strategies in real-world nursing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.