ArticleISME communications2026
Revealing community dynamics in polymicrobial infections through a quantitative framework.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory models provide tractable, reproducible systems that have long served as foundational tools in microbiology. However, the extent to which these models accurately mimic the biological environments they represent remains poorly understood. A quantitative framework was recently introduced to assess how well laboratory models capture microbial physiology in situ. However, applications of this framework have been limited to characterizing the physiology of a single species in human infections, leaving a gap in our understanding of overall microbial community physiology in polymicrobial contexts. Here, we extended this framework to evaluate the accuracy of laboratory model systems in capturing community-level functions in polymicrobial infection. As a proof of concept, we applied the extended framework to a polymicrobial model of human chronic wound (CW) infection. CWs harbor metabolically diverse bacterial species that engage in a range of microbe-microbe interactions, ultimately impacting community dynamics and disease progression. However, studies on the mechanistic drivers of chronic wound infection have relied on single species or pairwise approaches. Here, we demonstrate that our adapted framework can be used to develop accurate polymicrobial models. Further, we demonstrate that this extended framework can evaluate the occurrence of known microbe-microbe interactions. Building on our prior work in large-scale metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis, we propose a highly accurate 6-member synthetic bacterial community model i.e. representative of the taxonomic and functional complexity of human CW infections. This approach will support the development of ecologically relevant polymicrobial models and better treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.